Re: full integrity? (was: RE: Geopriv WG - meeting 5-6 Jun, other news)

From: Randall Gellens ^lt;rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 19:33:10 EDT

At 4:13 PM -0700 5/18/02, Aleksandar Gogic wrote:

> Protection of location privacy can be achieved by willingness to
> disclose it to a certain degree of precision, up to the point of
> barring any disclosure. My point on integrity was that disclosure
> to a level of precision is just as effective in protecting privacy,
> as provision of deceitful information would be. In fact, a poorly
> executed deceitful disclosure can be less effective.

Earlier, wg participants expressed a desire to be able to transmit
multiple locations, one of which was accurate, the rest bogus. Is
this still desired, or are we happy with one location?
Received on Tue May 21 19:35:42 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:23 EST