Re: [Geopriv] RE: [Simple] Changes in xcap-auth

From: Jonathan Rosenberg ^lt;>
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 14:07:03 EST

Tschofenig Hannes wrote:

> hi jonathan,
> could you describe how the domain authorization procedure works?
> where do you get the domain part for the identifier. the problem we
> saw in the past was that you have to understand the structure of
> the identifier in order for it to work.

I'm not sure I follow. I work for All URIs in my
domain are I'd like a policy which allows anyone
in, but blocks a few irritating people, say joe and
bob. So, I would have a policy like this:


Where is the complexity here?

> ciao hannes
> btw, another small issue. the name of the authorization draft is
> very misleading. there is no need to contain the name xcap in there
> since the policies should actually be independent of xcap. i
> noticed the problem with the names in various discussions. people
> automatically think that those two belong together.

Yes, I realize that - others have commented similarly. I will be happy
to split it up into pieces, wth the XML schema separately, once we
have a better grasp of how to bring these two works together.

-Jonathan R.

Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                600 Lanidex Plaza
Chief Technology Officer                    Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
dynamicsoft                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
Geopriv mailing list
Received on Thu Nov 6 14:19:27 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2004 - 12:32:24 EST