Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;andy@hxr.us>
Date: Mon Jul 31 2006 - 21:14:44 EDT

On Jul 31, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> That is all I have asked for, do not constrain the ABNF. If "how I
> use HTTP as a reference" goes in a different document that is fine
> providing the ABNF is not constrained in the conveyance
> specification. This is not how I read Brian's statement below:
>
> "This is NOT the discussion of what the ABNF of the location header
> looks
> like (although it would NOT have http/https in it for sure if we agree
> that an HTTP dereference protocol is a separate draft)."
>
> Which to me clearly says the ABNF will be restrict to exclude HTTP/
> HTTPS if there is agreement that the conveyance draft doesn't have
> specific text on how to deference an HTTP reference.
>
> Cheers
> James

Please keep in mind that this does not stop the draft from using MUST/
SHOULD language from stipulating "the URI MUST be a GEOPRIV standards
track using protocol."

-andy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:14:44 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 31 2006 - 21:30:25 EDT