GEOPRIV Working Group Archives
By Author

Google
WWW ecotroph.net
AuthorSubject Date
Abbott, Nadine B
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
Allison Mankin
 [Geopriv] WGLC for Geopriv-Radius draft11 Jul 2006
Andrew Newton
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance31 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus onchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance)26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt21 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] [Fwd: RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: (or prez:) in the location header]20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance:dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC3825 public safety18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt13 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt13 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt13 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt12 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] RFC 4589 on Location Types Registry03 Jul 2006
Brian Rosen
 RE: [Geopriv] URI restrictions in location conveyance, was Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re:[Sip] teasing apart:31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance31 Jul 2006
 RE: Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re:[Sip] teasing apart:28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowedURI27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt21 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http19 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Routing of calls based on location19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Reason Header with 42418 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference18 Jul 2006
Dawson, Martin
 RE: [Geopriv] URI restrictions in location conveyance, was Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
Dean Willis
 [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
Drage, Keith (Keith)
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header19 Jul 2006
Drage, Keith \(Keith\)
 Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http asa GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 RE: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensusonchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensusonchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good21 Jul 2006
Edge, Stephen
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt22 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt21 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
Hannes Tschofenig
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol29 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol29 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Pawn Ticket URLs29 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensusonchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Location by Reference Requirements27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Henning's Suggestion27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Routing of calls based on location20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Inconsistency between DHCP-CIVIC and Revised Civic LO17 Jul 2006
Henning Schulzrinne
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensusonchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format24 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format21 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Re: DHCP Civil Editorial Comments20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location Conveyance: Scenarios18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
James M. Polk
 Re: Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart:28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Henning's Suggestion27 Jul 2006
 Re: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensusonchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on HTTP(S) in SIP location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header26 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC382514 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt14 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt13 Jul 2006
Jeroen van Bemmel
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance30 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV usingprotocol30 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV usingprotocol29 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowedURI27 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] Routing of calls based on location20 Jul 2006
John Schnizlein
 Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header20 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC3825 public safety18 Jul 2006
jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com
 [Geopriv] RE: WGLC comments for draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-0714 Jul 2006
Marc Berryman
 RE: [Geopriv] Henning's Suggestion27 Jul 2006
Marc Linsner
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIPLocationConveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC382513 Jul 2006
 FW: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC382513 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC382513 Jul 2006
Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
 [Geopriv] WGLC comments for draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-0714 Jul 2006
Paul Kyzivat
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
Peterson, Jon
 [Geopriv] using protocols27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
Randall Gellens
 Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol29 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Pawn Ticket URLs28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 Re: Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart:28 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Re: [Sip] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt26 Jul 2006
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
 [Geopriv] RFC 4589 on Location Types Registry03 Jul 2006
Richard L. Barnes
 [Geopriv] Residual comment on common policy authentication11 Jul 2006
Rosen, Brian
 RE: [Geopriv] URI restrictions in location conveyance, was Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] URI restrictions in location conveyance, was Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereference mechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] How Location Conveyance specifies the allowed URI27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http19 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI - http19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
Stark, Barbara
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
Ted Hardie
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt21 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Re: [Ecrit] Routing of calls based on location19 Jul 2006
Thomson, Martin
 RE: Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re:[Sip] teasing apart:31 Jul 2006
 RE: Apparently RFC 3693 is incomplete; was RE: [Geopriv] Re:[Sip] teasing apart:30 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol28 Jul 2006
 RE: Teasing apart positions (was Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus onchanges to location-conveyance)27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format24 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt23 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good23 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format21 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] RE: [Sip] Allowing sip: in location header not good20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Revised Civic LO: Conversion from DHCP format20 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] DHCP Civil Editorial Comments19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Ecrit] Routing of calls based on location19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] SIP LocationConveyance: dereferencing location-by-reference19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] SIP Location Conveyance:dereferencing location-by-reference18 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header18 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC382514 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC382513 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt13 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] comments on draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-03.txt13 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] WGLC on Revised Civic Draft12 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Proposed Resolution to thedraft-ietf-geopriv-common-policy issue.03 Jul 2006
Tschofenig, Hannes
 AW: [Geopriv] Location Conveyance: Scenarios18 Jul 2006
 [Geopriv] Location Conveyance: Scenarios18 Jul 2006
Winterbottom, James
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] URI restrictions in location conveyance, was Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined31 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV usingprotocol29 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV usingprotocol29 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance27 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance26 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance25 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt21 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] draft-hdesinen-geopriv-pidflo-extn-00.txt20 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI- http19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] More on the contents of the Location header URI - http19 Jul 2006
 RE: [Geopriv] Resolution in RFC3825 public safety17 Jul 2006
Google
WWW ecotroph.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01 Aug 2012 EDT