Re: [Geopriv] coming to terms on location by reference

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;andy@hxr.us>
Date: Tue Sep 12 2006 - 21:01:56 EDT

On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Dawson, Martin wrote:

> Thanks Andy. What is the relationship, then, between the SIP
> conveyance
> having started as a Geopriv milestone and the current discussion? Does
> the former anticipate the latter in any case? That is, does it not
> indicate acceptance of location by reference already?

I would not consider location-by-reference for conveyance a settled
matter.

> Or is the
> discussion now focused directly on how the reference is
> "discovered" by
> the device and in particular whether it's a function of the location
> acquisition protocol?

If by acquisition and discovery you mean what we have been calling a
location configuration protocol, then the two are not necessarily
directly coupled. It is possible to have an LCP with references that
requires the UAC to dereference its location so that it may convey
that location.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:01:56 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 12 2006 - 22:19:14 EDT