Re: [Geopriv] rethinking data:

Hi Andy,

my opinion is known. In the design team we concluded:

security(location-by-value)=security(location-by-reference).

Ciao
Hannes

Andrew Newton schrieb:
> Having reviewed the archives on the recent location conveyance
> discussion, I see that I was the only one to raise an objection to the
> use of a data: URL in the Location header.
>
> My objection was based on the fact that it would add unnecessary
> complexity. Given some more time to think this through, I believe it
> adds no more complexity than the alternative... even much less
> complexity than the alternatives especially if there is no desire to
> specify its use with XML D-Sig. Of course, the use of this mechanism
> MUST be restricted specifically to emergency scenarios, and only when
> location is not present in the body.
>
> -andy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:04:46 +0200