RE: [Geopriv] Geopriv L7 LCP: New Requirement

From: Dawson, Martin ^lt;>
Date: Thu Feb 15 2007 - 21:06:02 EST

I don't see the tremendous benefit - however, I'm excited that there's some semblance of agreement. What's the requirement you see for LbyR? Do you mean the ability to support OBO? There is a requirement for OBO to be able to be done. In what sense is it not part of the "L7" acquisition protocol work? Which "nearly RFC" are you referring to specifically? Cheers, Martin -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Newton [] Sent: Friday, 16 February 2007 12:50 PM To: Dawson, Martin Cc: Stark, Barbara;; Otmar Lendl Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Geopriv L7 LCP: New Requirement On Feb 15, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Dawson, Martin wrote: > I agree with Andy - I think you could come up with the same scheme for > identity communication; it's just a protocol after all. Which, btw, could be used with any of the LbyR protocols. I mention SIP because it is closest to RFC. But this could be easily applied to other any of the HTTP LbyR proposals. In fact, this sounds like a great requirement to be added to the LbyR requirements. > I just don't see why you would suddenly want to use a different > protocol > for this special case of an OBO. I don't see any value in that. Suddenly? What is so sudden about this? But I do agree with OBO being the special case. And the advantage of divorcing it from L7-LCP work is that it can then be applied more broadly, across environments that use different LCPs. That would seem to be a tremendous benefit. -andy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2]

Geopriv mailing list
Received on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:06:02 -0600

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 15 2007 - 21:05:32 EST