Re: [Geopriv]WGLCondraft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-00(PIDF-LOdigitalsignatures)

From: Andrew Newton ^lt;andy@hxr.us>
Date: Thu Mar 08 2007 - 09:29:34 EST

On Mar 8, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Dawson, Martin wrote:

>> Knowledge of prior art by a patent inventor is probably something
>
> No - you miss the point again. The patent office won't be interested
> because the patent isn't about the thing you're suggesting it
> represents
> an encumbrance on. The prior art is not pertinent to the invention;
> it's
> pertinent to the topic that we've been discussing. I'm emphasising
> that
> they are two different things.

Actually, if you have information on prior art related to these
patents or any IPR relevant to GEOPRIV, it would be helpful if you
share that information with the working group.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:29:34 -0500

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 08 2007 - 09:27:50 EST