Re: [Geopriv] NENA Requirements

From: Hannes Tschofenig ^lt;Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Wed Mar 14 2007 - 03:44:34 EDT

Hi Martin,

> The arguments against location signing have been "Certificate management
> is too complicated - people won't succeed" and "PSAPs answer all the
> calls anyway so there's no point".
>
I hope you understand that with security there are a lot of tradeoffs.
There is no free lunch with security.
We are trying to balance the perceived security advantages to the costs.

When I worked on other security protocols I had to look at this tradeoff
quite often. At the beginning I often noticed that people get excited
when developing new security mechanisms but there is also a downside.

Ciao
Hannes

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:44:34 +0100

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 14 2007 - 03:41:49 EDT