Re: [Geopriv]draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-00.txt-Title/Name ofProtocol

From: Cullen Jennings ^lt;fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon Jun 18 2007 - 22:26:21 EDT

With my individual hat on - I agree with James and Brian. The name
correctly attributes it's heritage, it's a fine name, let's get on
with the bigger fish we have to fry.

On Jun 14, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote:

> Strangely I agree with Brian.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian Rosen [mailto:br@brianrosen.net]
>> Sent: Friday, 15 June 2007 4:57 AM
>> To: g.caron@bell.ca; mary.barnes@nortel.com; jmpolk@cisco.com
>> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: [Geopriv]draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-
>> delivery-00.txt-
>> Title/Name ofProtocol
>>
>> Oddly, I'm in favor of keeping the name. We selected this
>> protocol from
>> the
>> candidates. It may get modified in the normal course of the IETF
>> process,
>> but it was supposed to be what we wanted. The consensus was for
>> HELD, and
>> HELD is what it should be.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: g.caron@bell.ca [mailto:g.caron@bell.ca]
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 2:14 PM
>>> To: mary.barnes@nortel.com; jmpolk@cisco.com
>>> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
>>> Subject: RE: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-
>>> delivery-00.txt-
>>> Title/Name of Protocol
>>>
>>> Hi Mary,
>>>
>>> I personally don't see what good changing the name will do actually.
>> HELD
>>> is perfectly fine as far as I'm concern.
>>>
>>> And since it may have been referenced in other venues, it may be
>>> preferable to stick with HELD.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Guy Caron
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : Mary Barnes [mailto:mary.barnes@nortel.com]
>>> Envoyé : 14 juin 2007 14:02
>>> À : James M. Polk
>>> Cc : geopriv@ietf.org
>>> Objet : [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-00.txt -
>>> Title/Name of Protocol
>>>
>>> I've changed the title so that we can better track any additional
>>> feedback on this topic.
>>>
>>> I've seen Peter's response, as well, agreeing with this idea and
>>> I don't
>>> see a problem with changing the name to something that might be
>>> deemed
>>> more neutral, yet still descriptive.
>>>
>>> Putting creativity aside (i.e., my initial suggestions don't have
>>> a cute
>>> acronym), I'd suggest the new title as "Layer 7 Location Retrieval
>>> Protocol (L7LRP)" or "HTTP Enabled Location Retrieval (HELR)".
>>>
>>> Any other suggestions?
>>>
>>> Mary
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:54 PM
>>> To: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org; i-d-announce@ietf.org
>>> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] I-D
>>> ACTION:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-00.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> At 02:50 PM 6/8/2007, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>> directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the Geographic Location/Privacy
>>>> Working
>>>> Group of the IETF.
>>>>
>>>> Title : HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD)
>>>> Author(s) : M. Barnes
>>>> Filename :
>>> draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-00.txt
>>>> Pages : 40
>>>> Date : 2007-6-8
>>>
>>> I think it best to rename this to something other than "HELD". I'm
>>> sure to get flamed from some for this suggestion. However, there are
>>> many that know the old HELD - and want to hang on to those
>>> capabilities (some of which are not in this document). It seems
>>> less
>>> confusing to me to get every up on a new name (therefore a mental
>>> reset of what *this* is) vs. having the (probable) endless
>>> discussions about assumptions that what previous IDs called HELD is
>>> not in the current version of HELD, the latter of which is the one
>>> moving forward.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
> this email is prohibited.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> [mf2]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:26:21 -0700

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 18 2007 - 22:27:21 EDT