RE: Does anyone need a separate set of tagsfor"jurisdictional"vs"postal locations"?wasRE:[Geopriv]draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-01.txt

From: Marc Linsner ^lt;mlinsner@cisco.com>
Date: Wed Aug 08 2007 - 14:20:40 EDT

Jerome,

>
> I'm open to other solutions, but allowing only postal civic
> addresses, as it stands right now, would imply a lower
> quality of the E9-1-1 service.
>

Do you not agree with the i2 solution?

If you are able to cross reference the 'common-use' civil address to your
'richer' SAG location during the validation process, then you will be able
to cross reference that same 'common-use' information during the call
routing and the responder dispatch processes.

Agree?

-Marc-

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:20:40 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 08 2007 - 14:22:49 EDT