RE: [Geopriv] HELD Emergency Text

From: Winterbottom, James ^lt;James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
Date: Tue Oct 02 2007 - 16:34:35 EDT

Inline Clipped to the relevant section. > > Question to James et. al. on a reference: Do you ever think something like > the notion of emergencyRouting/Dispatch would get encoded in the > reference? > I hope not. [AJW] Assuming I understand what you mean, I don't think they are encoded into the reference. If I am using HELD as the dereference protocol for an HTTP URI then I can certainly specify a responseTime of emergencyROuting or emergencyDispatch and I think that this needs to be allowed. > > Then you could ask for both, but you need to do that in separate requests > so > that the response to the Routing request comes in as soon as it's ready. > [AJW] I am not sure eat this point if you are suggesting that this is a good thing or not. I think what you are trying to do is to tell the LIS that an emergencyDispatch request will be coming soon, so start getting ready now. We don't have a way to do this yet. > And of course if you get both, and you have them before you send the call > (meaning they come in quickly), then you want to use and send Dispatch and > discard Routing unless there is an error. [AJW] I agree with this last bit. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2]

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:34:35 -0500

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 02 2007 - 16:35:11 EDT