RE: [Geopriv] New Version Notification fordraft-wolf-civicaddresses-austria-00

From: Winterbottom, James ^lt;James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
Date: Fri Nov 09 2007 - 04:56:15 EST

Hi Hannes, Yes and no. I think that the regulators do need to specify how locations are to expressed within their jurisdictions in order to ensure that they are populated in a consistent manner. These may be done within national standards such as ANSI in the US, or they simply be decrees from on high, but they need to adopted by organizations with the clout to make them happen. I agree with you that this is very valuable work, and I praise Karl Heinz for taking the initiative to be the first to do it. I also agree that having a central place where all this information can be obtained is a good idea. I would go one step further and say having a common format is good.. *8) Cheers James > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] > Sent: Friday, 9 November 2007 8:52 PM > To: Winterbottom, James > Cc: Karl Heinz Wolf; GEOPRIV > Subject: Re: [Geopriv] New Version Notification fordraft-wolf- > civicaddresses-austria-00 > > Hi James, > > I am not sure that a regulator is the right consumer for this document. > > To some extend this relates to the discussion with had at the workshop > with Jim Price where he said that there are so many fields in the > PIDF-LO civic information and most of them are not needed in certain > countries. We argued that specific regions would only use certain fields. > > Someone needs to describe the best current practice in each country on > how the locally used civic addresses are mapped to the PIDF-LO civic > elements. > I wonder where one should publish such documents so that they can easily > be found. > > Ciao > Hannes > > > > Winterbottom, James wrote: > > Hi Karl Heinz, > > > > This is an interesting document to be sure and shows some very good > > thought patterns on how to use this information in a national context. > > Thanks. The content is probably something that you need your national > > regulators to approve however, rather than the IETF. > > > > Looking at the recommendation it seems that you are using <A6> to > > indicate the road or street name. If you are using the revised civic > > specification as you suggest, then you should be using the <RD> element > > for this. > > > > Cheers > > James > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Karl Heinz Wolf [mailto:khwolf1@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Friday, 9 November 2007 8:11 PM > >> To: GEOPRIV > >> Subject: [Geopriv] New Version Notification > >> > > fordraft-wolf-civicaddresses- > > > >> austria-00 > >> > >> we just submitted a draft for Civic Address Considerations for > >> > > Austria: > > > >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wolf-civicaddresses-austria- > >> 00.txt > >> > >> Comments and feedback appreciated. > >> > >> Karl Heinz > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] > >> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:00 AM > >> To: Alexander Mayrhofer > >> Cc: Karl Heinz Wolf > >> Subject: New Version Notification for > >> > > draft-wolf-civicaddresses-austria-00 > > > >> A new version of I-D, draft-wolf-civicaddresses-austria-00.txt has > >> been successfuly submitted by Alexander Mayrhofer and posted to the > >> IETF repository. > >> > >> Filename: draft-wolf-civicaddresses-austria > >> Revision: 00 > >> Title: Civic Address Considerations for Austria > >> Creation_date: 2007-11-09 > >> WG ID: Independent Submission > >> Number_of_pages: 18 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> Providing civic address considerations for individual countries is > >> proposed in RFC4119. This documents provides such considerations for > >> Austria, and proposes a mapping of Austrian address elements to the > >> PIDF Location Object (PIDF-LO). > >> > >> > >> > >> The IETF Secretariat. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Geopriv mailing list > >> Geopriv@ietf.org > >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------ > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may > > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. > > If you have received it in error, please notify the sender > > immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of > > this email is prohibited. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------ > > [mf2] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Geopriv mailing list > > Geopriv@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2]

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Fri, 9 Nov 2007 03:56:15 -0600

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 09 2007 - 04:56:27 EST