Re: [Geopriv] Requiring DNSSEC in draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery-04

From: Richard Barnes ^lt;rbarnes@bbn.com>
Date: Tue Nov 04 2008 - 18:04:57 EST

The appropriate reference for non-DNSSEC approaches to preventing
attacks on the integrity of DNS transactions is probably
draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience-07>

--Richard

Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
> My read of the draft is that it requires implementation (but not
> deployment) of DNSSEC on end user devices. WIth my Cisco/Linksys hat on,
> I would like to say that is is extremely unlikely that vendors of small
> phone devices are going to do this any time soon. I would highly
> encourage the WG to not make this required.
>
> sent with my individual contributor hat on,
> Cullen
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:04:57 -0500

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 04 2008 - 18:05:16 EST