Re: [Geopriv] adhoc meeting on civic-address-considerations on fri morning?

From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) ^lt;hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
Date: Wed Nov 19 2008 - 18:12:58 EST

I canceled the meeting since I got the impression that we made such good
progress during the week that our discussion items just got solved. Some
folks agreed to that.

We can, however, still chat about GEOPRIV, ECRIT, and many other things
in the hotel bar.
 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
>[mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext James M. Polk
>Sent: 19 November, 2008 17:10
>To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); ext Richard Barnes
>Cc: GEOPRIV
>Subject: Re: [Geopriv] adhoc meeting on
>civic-address-considerations on fri morning?
>
>At 04:21 PM 11/19/2008, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>Correct.
>
>correct you cancelled it (as Richard thinks) or correct we
>should meet (as your note says in this next sentence)?
>
>you just gave completely conflicting answers...
>
>>I also suggested that we could meet after the plenary in the
>hotel bar.
>>
>>Ciao
>>Hannes
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
>> >[mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Richard Barnes
>> >Sent: 19 November, 2008 16:17
>> >To: James M. Polk
>> >Cc: GEOPRIV
>> >Subject: Re: [Geopriv] adhoc meeting on
>civic-address-considerations
>> >on fri morning?
>> >
>> >If people are interested in both civic addresses and the admin
>> >plenary, we can probably slip it to 20:00.
>> >
>> >IIRC, Hannes cancelled the privacy discussions this week.
>> ><http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/current/msg06438.html>
>> >
>> >--Richard
>> >
>> >
>> >James M. Polk wrote:
>> >> At 03:49 PM 11/19/2008, Richard Barnes wrote:
>> >>> Earlier responses indicated that people who were interested were
>> >>> available for dinner tonight, so that's our current plan.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you're interested, please meet at the front door of the
>> >Hilton at
>> >>> 19:00.
>> >>
>> >> with the plenary still going on for an additional hour
>> >(i.e., till 2000)?
>> >>
>> >> Isn't our Privacy discussion tonight (and Thursday lunch)?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> --Richard
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> James M. Polk wrote:
>> >>>> At 01:35 PM 11/19/2008, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> In the GEOPRIV session we discussed the further steps for
>> >the civic
>> >>>>> address considerations document - i'd like to use the
>> >>>>> opportunity to collect feedback and ideas on that draft, plus
>> >>>>> probably get a direction for further work, especially on:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> - Process for reviewing and storing individual recommendations?
>> >>>>> - IANA registry for those recommendations?
>> >>>>> - I heard feedback that the draft was too long -
>> >suggested changes?
>> >>>>> - one or two more countries in the example section? Any
>> >volunteers?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I was thinking of meeting somewhere in the meeting lobby
>> >on Friday
>> >>>>> morning (9h30 - 11h?) -
>> >>>> this is when SIPPING is, so your turnout may be a little short
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> If you are interesting in contributing (or even just
>lurking),
>> >>>>> please drop me a private mail.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Alex
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> Geopriv mailing list
>> >>>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Geopriv mailing list
>> >>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>> >>
>> >>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Geopriv mailing list
>> >Geopriv@ietf.org
>> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:12:58 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 19 2008 - 18:14:57 EST