Re: [Geopriv] Consensus call: Basis for revisions to RFC 3825

From: Bernard Aboba ^lt;bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue Apr 21 2009 - 02:30:48 EDT

Yes.

> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:42:48 -0400
> From: rbarnes@bbn.com
> To: geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: [Geopriv] Consensus call: Basis for revisions to RFC 3825
>
> All,
>
> Based on the prior thread about the scope of 3825 fixes, it sounds like
> the closest of the three proposed documents to what people want is
> draft-thomson-geopriv-3825bis-03. So I would like to put the following
> question to the group:
>
> Should the WG document for revisions to RFC 3825 be based on
> draft-thomson-geopriv-3825bis-03?
>
> Please respond to the list by Monday, 27 April 2009.
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:30:48 -0700

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 21 2009 - 02:31:01 EDT