Re: [Geopriv] policy-uri

From: Hannes Tschofenig ^lt;Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Fri Jul 30 2010 - 08:07:59 EDT

Why not use the existing HELD Context document?

On 30.07.2010 14:05, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
> The only concern raised in the meeting with regard to
> draft-barnes-geopriv-policy-uri was when Hannes noted that the
> exchange could be made more efficient (in the HELD context) overlaying
> the policy interactions on a HELD transaction. For example, the
> client could provide policy data in a <locationRequest> object, and
> the server could specify policy it intends to use in the
> <locationResponse>. I think we should not do this.

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Received on Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:07:59 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 30 2010 - 08:08:46 EDT